Streamlined Best Practices for Committees

Help for 401k Plan Sponsors and Retirement Professionals


Newsletter for January 22, 2024

We are a knowledge service that finds, reviews, selects, organizes, and shares the most appropriate, relevant, and fresh information for professionals involved with 401k and 403b plans.

This weekly newsletter is just one method we utilize to circulate a small part of the information we processed this past week. It is a free service made possible by this week's newsletter sponsor.

Please visit their site.


Newsletter Sponsor

Add to Your Winter Reading List...

The 401k Averages Book 23rd Edition is a great resource for fee benchmarking data. Use the 401k Averages Book to better understand investment, recordkeeping and revenue sharing expenses for 401k plans. Still the most recognized resource book for comparative, non-biased 401k average cost information. Click here to order your copy.


In This Issue


Fiduciary and Plan Governance

Cultivating Retirement Success: Streamlined Best Practices for Committees

This 7-page guide seeks to describe, in simplified terms, the practices of effective and efficient retirement plan committees. It reflects experiential and industry knowledge of how retirement plan committees can be an outstanding vehicle for the successful execution of a plan sponsor's fiduciary duties.

Source: Multnomahgroup.com

Will 401k Auto-Portability Become a Cure-All or a Fiduciary Headache?

The turn of the calendar brings many things, and the turn of a new year brings more. Effective January 1, 2024, plan sponsors will find there's a new twist on an old familiar thing. It's called "auto-portability." Some believe it's destined to become a cure-all for much of what ails retirement savings today. Others, well, they're not so sure.

Source: Fiduciarynews.com

Understanding and Evaluating Retirement Plan Fees: A Holistic Approach

With retirement plan fees serving as the centerpiece for many different fiduciary breach lawsuits, understanding fee dynamics has become a critical responsibility for plan sponsors and fiduciaries. This article is the first in a four-part series on understanding and evaluating retirement plan fees. In part one, we explore the different types of retirement plan fees by taking an in-depth look at investment costs, provider fees, and fee allocation methodologies.

Source: Captrust.com

»»  Click here for more Fiduciary and Plan Governance Material

Insight: Studies, Research, Analysis, and Papers

The Case for Using Subsidies for Retirement Plans to Fix Social Security

Tax preferences for saving in retirement plans are expensive, about $185 billion in 2020, according to Treasury estimates. Strikingly, they also seem a bad deal for taxpayers, primarily benefiting high earners while failing to significantly boost national savings. Thus, the case is strong for eliminating or reducing these preferences. The resulting increase in tax revenues could be reallocated to fixing Social Security's finances.

Source: Bc.edu

»»  Click here for More Studies, Research, and White Papers

Items of Special Interest to Advisers and Other Service Providers

SECURE 2.0 Offers Plan Sponsors More Options to Engage Participants, but Implementation Could Challenge Benefit Rollouts

Newly in-effect SECURE 2.0 provisions may mitigate the challenges 401k plan sponsors face in engaging retirement plan participants in the saving and investing process. Recordkeepers will need to evaluate which provisions stand to help plan sponsor clients address the unique needs of plan participants, according to The Cerulli Report -- U.S. Retirement Markets 2023.

Source: Cerulli.com

Oxford Survey Finds DOL May Have Underestimated Compliance Cost of Fiduciary Proposal

A survey conducted by Oxford Economics estimated that the compliance costs associated with the DOL's fiduciary proposal could grossly exceed the estimates provided by the DOL. The survey, commissioned by the Financial Services Institute, estimated that $2.77 billion would be required to come into compliance with the proposal in the first year, whereas the DOL estimated first-year costs to be about $253 million.

Source: Planadviser.com

Court and Legal

Could Have, or Would Have, That Is the ERISA Question

An extremely rare jury verdict in an ERISA fiduciary breach case has led to a Shakesperean-like quandary. "Could Have, or Would Have, That is the Question." According to the class, the jury did not receive adequate guidance on how to assess loss and damages. The class claimed that the district court incorrectly instructed the jury that Yale and its fiduciary committee could avoid financial liability merely by showing that a prudent fiduciary "could have" made the same decisions, rather than requiring defendants to prove that a prudent fiduciary "would have" made the same decisions.

Source: Cohenbuckmann.com

»»  Click here for more Court and Other Legal Issues

Legislative and Washington DC

DOL Releases Proposed Auto-Portability Reg

The DOL announced on Jan. 18 that its Employee Benefits Security Administration released a proposed regulation on automatic portability transactions under SECURE 2.0. The DOL said automatic portability transactions aim to help workers keep track of their retirement savings accounts and improve retirement security by reducing cash-outs when they change jobs.

Source: Asppa.org

DOL Proposes SECURE 2.0 Auto-Portability Regulation

The Employee Benefit Security Administration has released a proposed regulation on automatic portability transactions under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, the DOL announced. According to an announcement from the federal agency, the regulation seeks to help workers keep track of their retirement savings accounts by reducing cash-outs when employees switch jobs.

Source: 401kspecialistmag.com

»»  Click here for more on Legislative and Washington Actions

Cyber and Plan Security

Canadian Plan Sponsors More Vigilant of Cybersecurity Risks When Dealing With Third-Party Vendors: Expert

Data management and transference are key areas of risk for pension plan sponsors as the vulnerability of engaging with third parties creates opportunities for cybercriminals, says Jillian Kennedy, a partner at Mercer. According to an online brief published last year by Ernst & Young, third-party service providers hired by public pension plan sponsors tend to be desirable targets of cybercriminals. Vulnerabilities can be found in plan sponsors' websites and member portals, said the report, noting investment organizations are also at risk due to the handling of investment operations conducted by its staff.

Source: Benefitscanada.com

ERISA Fiduciary Concerns Relating to Cybersecurity: Theft of Plan Assets

Since a cyber breach is not a matter of "if," but a matter of "when," fiduciaries of retirement plans should be addressing this risk. This 4-page article discusses the DOL's authority over cybercrimes, litigation involving cyber theft of participants' accounts, and risk mitigation techniques for plan fiduciaries.

Source: Foxrothschild.com

»»  Click here for more on Cybersecurity Issues

Compliance and Regulatory

"SECURE-ing" the Answers to Outstanding Questions on the Rothification of Employer Contributions

Since the issuance of Secure 2.0, several questions relating to the optional Roth provision have been lingering. On December 20, 2023, the IRS issued Notice 2024-2 providing guidance on several provisions under Secure 2.0, including Section 604. A brief overview of the guidance issued relating to designated Roth employer contributions is provided here.

Source: Beneficiallyyours.com

"Cross-Testing" in Qualified Profit Sharing Plans - 2024

Cross-testing is a method of demonstrating that a defined contribution plan is not discriminatory in favor of Highly Compensated Employees by analyzing the retirement benefit generated by the annual contributions for the HCEs to the retirement benefit generated by the contributions to the non-HCEs (rather than looking at the contribution itself). Here is a brief overview of the 2024 Cross-testing rules.

Source: Consultrms.com

SECURE 2.0: Guidance on Exception to Early Distribution Penalty for Terminally Ill Individuals

This article summarizes the guidance under IRS Notice 2024-2 for in-service distributions to terminally ill employees who qualify for a waiver from the 10% early withdrawal tax that normally applies to early distributions from retirement plans. In the Notice, distributions qualifying for relief from the early withdrawal tax are referred to as "terminally ill individual distributions."

Source: Beneficiallyyours.com

Audit Rule Will Put Some PEPs Out to Pasture

It looked great on paper, Pooled Employer Plans needed an audit only if they hit 1,000 participants or if they had an adopting employer with 100 or more participants. The IRS and DOL clarified that PEPs with 100 participants or more are subject to audit, rather than the 1,000-participant threshold that we thought was the interpretation in the SECURE Act.

Source: Jdsupra.com

2024 Adjusted Penalties for ERISA Violations

On January 11, 2024, the DOL released a final rule that provides new figures reflecting the adjusted civil penalty amounts for 2024, under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. The chart here shows the increased penalties for ERISA violations; however, please note that penalties under other federal laws are affected as well. The adjustments are effective January 15, 2024.

Source: Groom.com

»»  Click here for more Compliance and Regulatory Material

Marketplace News

Sageview Advisory Group Acquires Palmer Retirement Consulting

Commonwealth Latest to Partner with Pontera on 401k Management


Subscribe

Not getting your own issue of this eNewsletter? Click here to subscribe. It's free.

Email Change

Need to change your email address? Just drop us an email with both your old and new email addresses.

Unsubscribe

Use the link at the bottom of this newsletter to unsubscribe.


This eNewsletter is a digest of information published by a variety of web-based sources on 401k and related issues and is published as a service to our users. 401khelpcenter.com, LLC is not the author of the material unless specifically noted.

Articles are copyrighted to their publishers. If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please contact the source site immediately.

Hyperlinks in this document are provided as a convenience and we disclaim any responsibility for information, services, or products found on websites linked hereto. All links were tested before this eNewsletter was e-mailed to you to ensure that they are still functional, but publishers do move or delete articles. Therefore, we can't guarantee that the links provided will remain operational.

401khelpcenter.com does not endorse, approve, certify, or control this material and does not guarantee or assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, efficacy, or timeliness of the material. Use of any information obtained from this material is voluntary, and reliance on it should only be undertaken after an independent review of its accuracy, completeness, efficacy, and timeliness. Reference to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by 401khelpcenter.com. Opinions expressed are those of the author of the article and do not necessarily reflect the positions of 401khelpcenter.com.

THIS NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE INVESTMENT, TAX, ACCOUNTING, OR LEGAL ADVICE.

Copyright © 2024 by 401khelpcenter.com, LLC. All rights reserved. No reproductions without prior authorization, but you are free to email this copy (in its entirety) along to colleagues or clients. This newsletter may not be posted on any website.

401khelpcenter.com, LLC
7032 SW 26th Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97219

 


 
 
Delivery powered by Savicom
Delivery powered by Savicom